Artificial intelligence relies on knowledge representation (KR), which enables systems to reason while maintaining transparency and adaptability. This paper evaluates the main KR paradigms, including knowledge graphs for semantic expressiveness, formal logic for precise reasoning, and probabilistic approaches to handling uncertainty. The central argument is that the inherent limitations of individual paradigms necessitate strategic hybridisation. We critically analyse previous research to demonstrate that standalone approaches remain constrained in scalability, dynamic reasoning, and inconsistency management, despite excelling in specific aspects such as explainability, verifiability, and robustness. To address these challenges, we argue that future intelligent systems should adopt neuro-symbolic architectures that integrate computational efficiency, machine-readable structures, and human-interpretable knowledge models.
