Bioanalytical method development and validation are essential for reliable quantification of drugs in biological matrices. This research focuses on developing and validating a UPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma, adhering to established regulatory guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. The development and validation focus on creating a robust and sensitive assay suitable for bioequivalence studies and routine therapeutic drug monitoring. This method utilizes bisoprolol D5 and hydrochlorothiazide C13 D2 as internal standards to enhance accuracy and precision. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) with an isocratic mobile phase consisting of 10 mM ammonium formate buffer, methanol, and 0.1% ammonia solution (10:90, v/v). The flow rate was set at 0.3 mL/min, with a retention time of 2.2 min. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used with positive ESI for bisoprolol (m/z 326.36 → 116.13, internal standard m/z 331.36 → 121.13) and negative ESI for hydrochlorothiazide (m/z 296.11 → 269.00, internal standard m/z 299.11 → 270.00). The analytes and their respective internal standards were co-extracted using a liquid–liquid extraction method with tert-butyl methyl ether as the extraction solvent. Linearity for bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide was maintained over a concentration range of 1–100 ng/mL for bisoprolol and 1.0–300 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide, respectively, using a weighted least squares linear regression model (1/x). This method achieved a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 ng/mL, making it highly sensitive for the detection of these analytes. Moreover, the method demonstrated high accuracy, precision, selectivity, and reduced overall analysis time, making it well suited for routine analysis and bioequivalence studies of 10 mg bisoprolol and 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide tablets.

Title

Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Publisher

Wiley

Publisher Country

United Kingdom

Indexing

Scopus

Impact Factor

2.0

Publication Type

Both (Printed and Online)

Volume

--

Year

--

Pages

--