Abstract;  This study adresses abrogation (Naskh) in Sayyid Qutb interpretation (In The Shade of the Qur’an) and how it affects his juristic opinions through the extrapolation of his interpretation of all the verses he mentions that they are abrogated, according to an analytic, inductive, critical and comparative approaches.

The study found that although Qutb concurred abrogation, yet he was very concerned in narrowing its scope to the extreme. His book has only three abrogated verses. Qutb adopts various ways to restrict abrogation. He either brings verses together, allocates verses, relates the arbitrations to an interim situation or extracts his own understanding of the verse beyond the scope of abrogation’s juristic judgments.

Sayyid Qutb had used his approach to strengthen his opinions that he chooses, such as his opinion in the dowager’s right of a whole-year awaiting period, and his opinion in the necessity of spending money apart from Zakat.

He also used his approach sometimes to strengthen his opinions that are against the widely known ones, such as his opinion in the conditions of retaliation in the cases of groups infighting, his opinion in the provisionally of Jihad’s injunctions, ad his opinion in some captive’s injunctions.

Title

مجلة قبس للدراسات الانسانية والاجتماعية

Publisher

جامعة الشهيد حمه لخضر- الوادي

Publisher Country

Algeria

Publication Type

Both (Printed and Online)

Volume

5

Year

2021

Pages

1058-1091