Article
Physiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients:A cross-sectional studyPhysiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional study
  • January 2020
  • Saudi Journal for Health Sciences 9(1)
2.2
1
Fady M. A Hassouna
0 new
1
ยท
Kok Lun Pang
0 new
32
Article
Physiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients:A cross-sectional studyPhysiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional study
Mariam, increase the visibility of this article
If your co-authors confirm their authorship, more researchers will find and read this article on ResearchGate.
Abstract and figures
Objectives: The study aimed at assessing the stressors among hemodialysis (HD) patients and finding out whether there is any relation between these stressors and patients' characteristics in the North of the West Bank. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptiveโ€“analytical study was carried out. Data collection took place at three governmental hospitals and one private hospital where 120 HD patients responded to the HD stress scale. Results: Hemodialysis patients were mildly to moderately stressed, the greatest perceived sources of stress appeared to be โ€œphysiological stressorsโ€ (mean = 2.655), but the item with the highest percentage was 'limitation on time and place for vacation' (84.2%) which belong to psychosocial stress subscale, and the item stress with the least percentage was โ€œdependency on nurses and techniciansโ€(45%). Conclusions: There was significant difference between the psychosocial stressors and duration of treatment. The study concluded that HD patients are in need for continuous support, and it is recommended different contributions to improve the quality of their life.
โ€ฆ 
Patients' characteristics
Physiological stressors among hemodialysis patients
Page 1
50 ยฉ 2020 Saudi Journal for Health Sciences | Published by Wolters Kluwer - MedknowINTRODUCTIONChronic kidney disease (CKD) has been one of the main health problems affecting various populations globally. The prevalence and the cost of treatment are dramatically increasing.[1,2] CKD is an irreversible and progressive kidney failure.[3] It refers to the aberration of kidney function, evident for more than 3 months, that affects health and could eventually progress to endโ€‘stage renal disease (ESRD).[4,5] Advanced CKD can be managed though renal replacement therapy (RRT) which involves renal transplantation, hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis.[6]One of the mentioned managements is HD therapy. Although evidences suggest that it is beneficial, it is considered to be an expensive and burdensome therapy for patients with ESRD. There were also identified challenges and issues among patients who were on a longโ€‘term dialysis therapy. Increased dependence on caregivers and interference in personal, family, and social life were few of these challenges,[7,8] which cause stress and affect the total wellโ€‘being and quality of life among ESRD patients.[9]According to the Palestinian Health Information Center, in 2003, 255 patients from the West Bank were under the dialysis treatment. In 2010, this figure dramatically increased to 800 patients. In 2016, the number of patients receiving dialysis services in hospitals in the West Bank was 1119 on a Access this article onlineWebsite:www.saudijhealthsci.orgQuick Response CodeDOI:10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_88_19Physiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional studyJamal A. S. Qaddumi, Mariam Alโ€‘Tell, Omar Almahmoud1, Dina T. N. Issa2, Majed Sulaiman Alamri3, Jestoni Dulva Maniago4, Omar Mohamed Khraisat5, Abdullah Sameh Khawaldeh5, Reem Nassar ALโ€‘Dossary6Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 1Department of Nursing, College of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, 2General Directorate of Nursing, Ministry of Health, Nablus, Palestine, 3Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafar Al-Batin, 4Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, 6Department of Nursing Education, College of Nursing, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 5Department of Nursing, Jerash University, Jerash, JordanAddress for correspondence: Dr. Jestoni Dulva Maniago, Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected]Objectives: The study aimed at assessing the stressors among hemodialysis (HD) patients and finding out whether there is any relation between these stressors and patientsโ€™ characteristics in the North of the West Bank. Methods: A quantitative, crossโ€‘sectional, descriptiveโ€“analytical study was carried out. Data collection took place at three governmental hospitals and one private hospital where 120 HD patients responded to the HD stress scale. Results: Hemodialysis patients were mildly to moderately stressed, the greatest perceived sources of stress appeared to be โ€œphysiological stressorsโ€ (mean = 2.655), but the item with the highest percentage was โ€˜limitation on time and place for vacationโ€™ (84.2%) which belong to psychosocial stress subscale, and the item stress with the least percentage was โ€œdependency on nurses and techniciansโ€(45%). Conclusions: There was significant difference between the psychosocial stressors and duration of treatment. The study concluded that HD patients are in need for continuous support, and it is recommended different contributions to improve the quality of their life.Key words: Demographics, hemodialysis, physiological, psychosocial, stressorsABSTRACTOriginal ArticleHow to cite this article: Qaddumi JA, Al-Tell M, Almahmoud O, Issa DT, Alamri MS, Maniago JD, et al. Physiological and psychosocial stressors among Palestinian hemodialysis patients:A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Health Sci 2020;9:50-5.This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributionโ€‘NonCommercialโ€‘ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work nonโ€‘commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.For reprints contact: [email protected]Submitted: 21โ€‘Octโ€‘2019 Revised: 15โ€‘Decโ€‘2019 Accepted: 30โ€‘Decโ€‘2019 Published: 26โ€‘Febโ€‘2020[Downloaded free from http://www.saudijhealthsci.org on Thursday, November 5, 2020, IP: 212.14.244.178]
Page 2
Qaddumi, et al.: Stressors among hemodialysis patientsSaudi Journal for Health Sciences - Volume 9, Issue 1, January-April 2020 51regular basis with a total of 147,494 HD. In fact, ESRD is rapidly increasing among Palestinian, and it is a common health problem and the eighth leading cause of death in Palestine.[10]These patients diagnosed with ESRD were exposed to different levels and various types of stress, which is also determined by their coping mechanisms. Poor coping and ineffective stress resolution could aggravate the current medical condition and is potentially fatal.[11]Knowledge of the most stressors facing HD patients is beneficial for nurses and other members of the healthโ€‘care team in developing their plan of care and case management. Evidence shows that this particular area of inquiry contributes to the improvement of the quality of life, minimizing potential complications of this disease, and survival of these people and decreases cost, so it is worth to determine the possible causes of stress among HD patients in the North of the West Bank, Palestine.Moreover, only limited studies are available in Palestine, and there is some inconsistency even in conducted studies. In these patients, identifying and introducing stressor factors is the first step of intervention and planning.[10,11] Therefore, assessing physiological and psychosocial stressors will provide inputs to social health and planning to support Palestinian HD patients.METHODSThis study is a quantitative, descriptive, crossโ€‘sectional design. Data collection took place from January to March 2016 in three governmental hospitals and one private hospital in the North of the West Bank, Palestine. The institutional review board only allowed the researchers to conduct their entire data collection procedure for 2 months due to human protection and logistical issues.Of all ESRD patients (379) who underwent HD in four included hospitals, 120 HD patients of total 379 were included in the study using the convenient sampling method.HD Stressor Scale (HSS) was adopted to measure the stressors among HD patients. The HSS was developed by Baldree et al. to measure the level of stress experienced by HD patients. It consisted of 32โ€‘items that describe the stressors which HD patients mostly face in their life. The items consisted of a 4โ€‘point Likert scale that ranged from 1 to 4 which denoted the severity of stress experienced. The 32โ€‘items scale was grouped into two stressor subscales: โ€œpsychosocial (25โ€‘items) stressorsโ€ and โ€œphysiological (7โ€‘items) stressors.โ€[12]Faceโ€‘toโ€‘face interview using a structured questionnaire has been used to fulfill the questionnaire which consisted of two parts: the first part included demographic profile such as gender, age, and dialysis duration and the second part contained HSS.The questionnaire was translated into Arabic which was the participantsโ€™ motherโ€‘tongue language using the Brislin backโ€‘translation method, the most frequently used and accepted method for effective translation equivalence of instruments. The method began with a bilingual expert translating the instrument from English into Arabic with consultations from an expert panel to ensure clarity, detect linguistic mistakes, and ensure crossโ€‘cultural equivalence. Then, a blind backโ€‘translation from Arabic to English was undertaken by another bilingual translator. Consequently, no issues and errors were found when the backโ€‘translated version was compared with the English version.The internal consistency Cronbachโ€™s alpha for the total HSS scale from previous studies was 0.89, indicating good internal reliability.[12] A pilot study was conducted with ten HD patients to identify potential problem, clarity of questions translation, understanding of questionnaire, and time duration to accomplish the questionnaire. The pilot sample was excluded from the total sample, and the time required to complete the questionnaire was 20โ€“30 min.The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Middle East FZโ€‘L.L.C, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) was used to statistically analyze the data. Both tโ€‘test and ANOVA were used to test the relationship between stress types and demographic characteristics.RESULTSPatientsโ€™ characteristicsTable 1 shows that 64.2% of the HD patients were male and 36.7% of them were in the age groups of 40โ€“49 and 50โ€“65 years. Regarding their duration of treatment, 43.3% of them had a period of <3 years, while 8.3% of them had it from 6 to 8 years.Hemodialysis stress scale resultsTable 2 shows the mean, standard deviation (SD), percentage, and level of agreement of HD patients on the stress scale. The total mean score was 2.59, which revealed big agreement (65.0%) in using by HD patients. Regarding HSS items, the percentage for the highest item according to the total scale โ€œLimits on time and place for vacationโ€ was rated as most (84.2%) troublesome stressors items. According to the subscales, in physiological stress subscale, โ€œFeeling tiredโ€ was rated as most (76.1%) troublesome stressors items, followed by โ€œLoss of body functionโ€ (75.6%), while the stress item with the lowest score was โ€œArterial and venous stickโ€ (58.2%).Table 3 reveals that psychosocial stress subscale items โ€œLimits on time and place for vacationโ€ were rated as most (84.2%) troublesome stressors items, followed by decrease in sexual derive (82.3%), while the stress item with the lowest score was dependency on nurses and technicians (58.2%).[Downloaded free from http://www.saudijhealthsci.org on Thursday, November 5, 2020, IP: 212.14.244.178]
Page 3
Qaddumi, et al.: Stressors among hemodialysis patients52 Saudi Journal for Health Sciences - Volume 9, Issue 1, January-April 2020Table 1: Patientsโ€™ characteristicsDemographic data variablesn (%)GenderMale77 (64.2)Female43 (35.8)Age (years)18โ€‘3016 (13.3)31-3916 (13.3)40โ€‘4944 (36.7)50-6544 (36.7)Duration of treatment (years)<352 (43.3)3-545 (37.5)6โ€‘810 (8.3)9 and more13 (10.8)Total120 (100)Table 2: Physiological stressors among hemodialysis patientsScale (2-1 ): Physiological stressorsThe orderNumberItemsMeanยฑSDPercentageAgreement61Feeling tired3.04ยฑ1.0076.1Big72Loss of body function3.02ยฑ1.0675.6Big33Muscle cramps/soreness2.68ยฑ1.0967.1Big24Nausea and vomiting2.56ยฑ1.2164.2Big55Stiffening of joints2.49ยฑ1.1462.4Big46Itching2.40ยฑ1.2260.2Big17Arterial and venous stick2.32ยฑ1.0658.2MiddleTotal mean for scale 12.65ยฑ0.6666.4BigSD: Standard deviationThe relation between stressor types according to HD patients showed that the mean score of stressors for male was 2.64 ยฑ 0.44 and for female was 2.52 ยฑ 0.52, with no significant difference (t = 1.34, P = 0.18). Regarding the stressor subscale, the mean score of physiological stressors for male was 2.60 ยฑ 0.64 and for female was 2.74 ยฑ 0.69, while the mean score of psychosocial stressors for male was 2.66 ยฑ 0.46 and for female was 2.53 ยฑ 0.54, with no significant difference.The relation between stressor type and age illustrated that the mean score for stress scale was 2.62 for the age group of 40โ€“49 years and 2.53 for the age group of 18โ€“30 years, with no significant difference (F = 0.19, P = 0.90). Regarding the stress subscale, the mean score of physiological stressors was 2.72 for the age group 50โ€“65 years, while for psychosocial stressors, the mean score was 2.66 for the age group of 40โ€“49 years, with no significant difference.The relation between stressor types and duration of treatment illustrated that the mean score of stress scale for the duration of treatment from 3 to 5 years was 2.735 and for the duration of treatment from 6 to 8 years was 2.338, with significant difference for the duration of treatment from 3 to 5 years (F = 3.05, P = 0.031). Regarding the stress subscale, the mean score of physiological stressors was 2.85 for the duration of treatment from 9 years and more, with no significant difference. While for psychosocial stressors, the mean score was 2.80 for the duration of treatment from 3 to 5 years and 2.220 for the duration of treatment from 6 to 8 years, with significant difference for the duration of treatment from 3 to 5 years (F = 4.40, P = 0.006).DISCUSSIONThe study results revealed that about twoโ€‘third of the HD patients were experienced mildโ€‘toโ€‘moderate level of total stress, but physiological stress was slightly more (2.65 ยฑ 0.66) stressful than psychosocial once (2.62 ยฑ 0.48); similar findings were found in a study done by Mok and Tam, and they reported that the mean score for the physiological stressors was 1.50 (SD = 0.63) and for the psychosocial stressors was 1.30 (SD = 0.58).[13] In addition, the study done by Hsin et al. (2014) found that patients had more physiological stressors than psychosocial stressors.[14] In contrast, Ahmad and Al Nazly[15] found that psychosocial stressors were more prominent than physiological stressors.The findings of the current study illustrated that the stress item with the highest percentage (84.2%) was limits on time and place for vacation, which was similar to other studies.[16,17] This could be related to the intensive treatment hours/week that make patients unable to travel couple a day and lack of recreation places for spending vacation due to the restriction on travelling in the West Bank of Palestinian Authority.The second source of stress (82.3%) was decrease in sexual desires, which was in agreement with[18,19] studies that found sexual dysfunction prevalence among predialysis patients (9%) and higher prevalence among dialysis patients (90%) of either sex. On the other hand, the results were different from Shinde and Mane[20] results that found mild stress according to a decrease in sexual derives among HD patients.This might be that the sexual dysfunction is much more common in patients with ESRD than in the general population due to the nature of the disease such as anemia and uremia which are the organic factors that affect the erectile [Downloaded free from http://www.saudijhealthsci.org on Thursday, November 5, 2020, IP: 212.14.244.178]
Similar research
Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Indonesia has a major impact on the economic burden, particularly hemodialysis treatment. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-of-illness of hemodialysis and to examine its associated factors in Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 and 1,365 participants with end-stage renal disease were recruited from eight hospitals representative of the western, central, and eastern regions of Indonesia. Medical records of patients have been reviewed for clinical data, and hospital administrative records were reviewed for cost data. Costs of illness were measured from a patient perspective using a bottom-up approach. The direct costs for each patient and indirect costs for each patient and their attendants have been calculated. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of the average annual cost. Results: The vast majority of the patients were male (57.14%), 45-60 years of age (55.46%), and employed (57.58%).
Background: Chronic kidney disease does not usually cause symptoms until it reaches an advanced stage. During the progression of the disease, the patients experiences some of the common symptoms like lack of energy, difficulty concentrating, poor appetite, insomnia, muscle cramping, edema , dry skin, increased urinary frequency, bruising, shortness of breath, and bone pain. Aim: To assess the level of stress and coping among Indian patients subjected to hemodialysis at Dialysis unit. Design: A cross sectional descriptive research design was adopted. Methods: Sixty patients were selected using convenient sample from the dialysis unit of tertiary care hospital, South India. Study participants were completed the questionnaire on stress and coping. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Among patients subjected for dialysis, 39 (65.00%) of the study participants were having mild stress and 12(20.00%) of the study participants were having moderate stress. The study also revealed that 38(63.3%) of the participants were never had coping whereas 22(36.7%) of them had sometimes coping. Conclusion: Negative correlation between the level of stress and coping among the patients subjected to dialysis insist on intervention to overcome the stress thereby coping with the present condition
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is an irreversible and life-threatening condition. In Jordan, the number of ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis is on the rise. Identifying stressors and coping strategies used by patients with ESRD may help nurses and health care providers to gain a clearer understanding of the condition of these patients and thus institute effective care planning. The purpose of this study was to identify stressors perceived by Jordanian patients on hemodialysis, and the coping strategies used by them. A convenience sample of 131 Jordanian men and women was recruited from outpatients' dialysis units in four hospitals. Stressors perceived by participants on hemodialysis and the coping strategies were measured using Hemodialysis Stressor Scale, and Ways of Coping Scale-Revised. Findings showed that patients on hemodialysis psychosocial stressors scores mean was higher than the physiological stressors mean. Positive reappraisal coping strategy had the highest mean among the coping strategies and the lowest mean was accepting responsibility. Attention should be focused towards the psychosocial stressors of patients on hemodialysis and also helping patients utilize the coping strategies that help to alleviate the stressors. The most used coping strategy was positive reappraisal strategy which includes faith and prayer.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is an irreversible and life-threatening condition. In Jordan, the number of ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis is on the rise. Identifying stressors and coping strategies used by patients with ESRD may help nurses and health care providers to gain a clearer understanding of the condition of these patients and thus institute effective care planning. The purpose of this study was to identify stressors perceived by Jordanian patients on hemodialysis, and the coping strategies used by them. A convenience sample of 131 Jordanian men and women was recruited from outpatients' dialysis units in four hospitals. Stressors perceived by participants on hemodialysis and the coping strategies were measured using Hemodialysis Stressor Scale, and Ways of Coping Scale-Revised. Findings showed that patients on hemodialysis psychosocial stressors scores mean was higher than the physiological stressors mean. Positive reappraisal coping strategy had the highest mean among the coping strategies and the lowest mean was accepting responsibility. Attention should be focused towards the psychosocial stressors of patients on hemod-ialysis and also helping patients utilize the coping strategies that help to alleviate the stressors. The most used coping strategy was positive reappraisal strategy which includes faith and prayer.
Purpose: The current study was made with the objective of determining the effect of group training implemented on hemodialysis patients for their stress management, psychosocial adjustment and self-care strength. Method and Material: The single group pre-experiment model with pre-test โ€“ post-test was used. The participants were selected from a group of 100 patients who were undergoing treatment in 2011, at the Hemodialysis Units of two state hospitals in North Cyprus. The sampling composed of 90 patients who met the screening criteria and fully consented to take part in the study conducted between January 2011 and June 2011. The researcher collected data before training and 3 months after training by using the Patient Sociodemographic Characteristics Form, Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale-Self-Report, Self-care Strength Evaluation Scale and the Hemodialysis Stressor Scale. Results: It was observed that as the stressors increased in hemodialysis patients, the self-care strength and adjustment to illness decreased. Additionally, it was also found that as the self-care strength increased the adjustments to illness also increased. Furthermore, it was determined that the stressors of female patients were higher compared to male patients. The adjustment of patients working and those receiving treatment at Institution 2 were found to be lower. Conclusions: It was concluded that there was a decrease in the stressors perceived by hemodialysis patients who had undergone the training program. Moreover, these patients also evidenced an increase in the adjustment to illness and in self-care strength after the training program had been implemented.